Action Research in Education: Meaning, Steps, a Worked Example and a Template for Teachers
Updated 31 October 2026 · Facts checked against the sources listed at the end
Action research in education is a small, careful study that a teacher does in their own class to solve a real teaching problem. You notice a problem, try one change, collect evidence before and after, and decide what to keep. NCERT's Central Institute of Educational Technology (CIET) describes action research as a process for problem solving, and its course module defines it as a process where activities are carried out systematically to find the solution of a problem related to any aspect of teaching.
This guide covers the meaning, how it differs from degree research, the steps NCERT teaches, three ways to run it, and how it can count towards your yearly professional development hours. Then it gives one complete example for a Class 9 maths batch, a one-page plan to copy, a simple way to read results, a report outline and the common mistakes.
What is action research in education?
Every teacher has a problem that keeps coming back. Half the class cannot do word problems. Students come late to the first period. Nobody speaks in the English speaking class. Action research is the usual instinct to try a fix, done properly: write down the problem, choose one clear change, measure students before, run the change for a fixed time, measure again, and think about what the evidence says.
NCERT's module on the steps of action research puts the idea simply. Action research is done by the teacher who is part of the problem. A person who is not part of the problem cannot do action research on it. The aim is to find a solution to a classroom problem so that the most students benefit. It is not about proving a big theory. It is about your class, this term.
Educators abroad describe it the same way. A short note from the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) in the United States quotes Parsons and Brown (2002): action research is a form of investigation designed for use by teachers to attempt to solve problems and improve professional practices in their own classrooms. The same note quotes Emily Calhoun's plain version: a fancy way of saying let's study what's happening at our school and decide how to make it a better place.
The term itself is old. Kurt Lewin, a social psychologist, published a paper titled "Action Research and Minority Problems" in the Journal of Social Issues in 1946. In India, NCERT's CIET first started an online course on action research in 2010, and it now offers its action research course for teachers through SWAYAM.
The characteristics NCERT lists
NCERT's module gives eleven characteristics. In short, action research is:
- a process with a set of activities, not a single event;
- systematic, so you follow steps and write things down;
- aimed at an immediate problem the teacher faces;
- cooperative, because it works best with colleagues and students;
- flexible in method;
- self-evaluated, because the teacher judges the result;
- not meant to be generalised to other schools; and
- cyclic, not a straight line: one round often leads to the next.
Action research vs formal research: the difference
The word research makes many teachers think of a PhD. Action research is much smaller. The table uses the points NCERT's modules make, so you know what is enough for a first project.
| Point | Action research (in your class) | Formal research (for a degree or journal) |
|---|---|---|
| Who does it | The teacher who faces the problem | A researcher, often from outside the class |
| Aim | Solve an immediate problem in this class | Build knowledge that holds for a wider population |
| Group studied | Your own students, chosen on purpose (purposive sampling) | A sample chosen to represent a population, often at random |
| Can the result be generalised? | No, and it does not need to be | Yes, that is usually the goal |
| Design | Usually one group, tested before and after (pre-test, treatment, post-test) | Often two groups or more, with controls |
| Tools | Teacher-made tests and checklists are normal | Standardised tools with known validity and reliability |
| Time | A few weeks, inside normal teaching | Months or years |
| Output | A short report under headings, shared with colleagues | A thesis or paper, divided into chapters |
Two cautions from NCERT: your group is not a representative sample, so do not claim the method works everywhere; and a person working for a degree should not do action research for it.
Action research is close to two ideas you may already use. Formative assessment gives you quick evidence during teaching. Remedial teaching is the extra help for students who are behind. Action research is the wrapper that turns either of these into a planned test of what actually works.
Three ways to do it: alone, with a colleague, or as a school
Emily Calhoun's 1993 ASCD article, "Action Research: Three Approaches", is still a useful way to choose the size of your project. She describes three kinds.
| Approach | Who is involved | Good for | Watch out for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individual teacher research | One teacher, sometimes with students and parents | A problem in one class: a topic, a habit, a skill | No one checks your thinking; ask a colleague to read your plan |
| Collaborative action research | A team, which can be as small as two people | Two teachers who teach the same class or subject in different sections | Agree on one tool and one schedule, or you cannot compare |
| Schoolwide action research | The whole staff picks one shared problem | Late coming, reading levels, homework completion across a school or coaching centre | Needs a coordinator and regular meetings; slower to start |
Calhoun says the key to choosing is the purpose of the inquiry. A single tutor or new coaching faculty member should start alone and small. Where two teachers share a batch, a two-person project gives you a second pair of eyes without the meetings of a whole-school project.
The steps of action research, as NCERT teaches them
NCERT's module lists five steps: identification of the problem, formulation of hypothesis, method of research, data collection, and data analysis. Its later modules add report writing as the last step. Here is each step in teacher's language, with the decision you face at each one.
Step 1: Identify the problem and write the title
Pick one weekly problem that matters for learning and that you can change yourself. NCERT's examples include students coming late, not paying attention, failing in mathematics, not being interested in some subjects, and making punctuation mistakes. Then narrow it. "Students are weak in maths" is too wide. "Class 9 students cannot turn word problems into linear equations" is something you can work on in three weeks.
NCERT gives a clear rule for the title: it must tell the reader the variable, the group, and the type of study. Its sample titles follow the pattern "A study of the effect of X on Y of class Z students of School S", for example "A study of effect of Dictation in English on Achievement in English of class V students" of a named school. If the title does not name the group, NCERT treats it as an incomplete title.
Step 2: Write one sharp objective
The objective says exactly what you will compare. NCERT's model objectives all start the same way: to compare mean scores of something before and after the change. NCERT notes that researchers often write vague objectives, which is a problem because they do not tell you what data to collect.
Step 3: State your hypothesis
A hypothesis is your tentative answer. NCERT's modules suggest the null form when you have no strong base from earlier studies, for example: there is no significant difference in mean scores before and after the change. If many earlier studies point one way, you may write a directional hypothesis instead. For a first project in a tuition class, the null form is fine and keeps you honest.
Step 4: Plan the method: group, tool and design
Group: your own class or batch. NCERT says purposive sampling is the right choice, and usually the whole group takes part. Tool: a short test or checklist you make yourself. NCERT accepts that teacher-made tools are normal in action research, while noting their validity and reliability are unknown. Design: NCERT recommends the pretest-posttest single group design, written as O1 X O2, where O1 is the pre-test, X is the change (the treatment) and O2 is the post-test with the same tool.
Step 5: Collect the data
Give the pre-test, run the change for a fixed time, then give the same test again under the same conditions. NCERT's examples run the change for a set number of days at a fixed time each day, such as 30 minutes a day for 15 days, and say the test time must be the same before and after. The treatment should be long enough for an effect to show.
Step 6: Analyse, reflect and write it up
Compare the before and after scores. NCERT's module names the paired samples t-test (also called the correlated t-test) as the formal method for this design and says SPSS software can be used. For a classroom decision, a simple comparison of averages and of how many students improved is a good start; a section below shows how. Then write a short report so that other teachers can repeat what you did.
A worked example: action research in a Class 9 maths batch
Here is one complete plan, written the way NCERT's modules suggest. The setting is an evening tuition batch, but the same plan works in a school section. Everything below is a plan to copy and change; the results table is left for you to fill in with your own students' scores.
The problem the teacher noticed
In unit tests, many students in a Class 9 batch solve linear equations correctly when the equation is given, but leave word problems blank or write a wrong equation. The teacher sees that students start calculating before deciding what the unknown is.
The change the teacher will try
A four-step routine for every word problem: read the problem twice; underline what is given and circle what is asked; write "Let x be ..." in words before any numbers; and check the answer by putting it back into the story. The teacher models two problems in each class, then students do two in pairs using the routine, for 20 minutes per class.
| Part of the plan | What the teacher writes |
|---|---|
| Title | A study of the effect of a four-step word-problem routine on achievement in linear-equation word problems of Class 9 students of the evening batch of [your tuition centre], [your town] |
| Variable | Achievement in linear-equation word problems (dependent); the four-step routine (the change, or independent variable) |
| Group | All students of the Class 9 evening batch (purposive sampling) |
| Objective | To compare the mean scores of achievement in linear-equation word problems of the students before and after practice with the four-step routine |
| Hypothesis (null form) | There is no significant difference in the mean scores of achievement in linear-equation word problems of the students before and after practice with the four-step routine |
| Tool | A teacher-made test: 10 word problems, 2 marks each (1 for the correct equation, 1 for the correct answer), 30 minutes |
| Design | Pretest-posttest single group: O1 X O2 |
| Treatment | 20 minutes per class, every class day, for three weeks |
| Extra evidence | An exit slip after each class: "Which step did you find hardest today?" and the teacher's short diary notes |
| Ethics | Tell the centre head and parents what you are trying; use roll numbers, not names, in the report; no student loses marks because of the study |
Why the plan is built this way
- The test marks the equation and the answer separately, because the real problem is setting up the equation, not the arithmetic.
- The same test is used before and after, as NCERT's design needs. If students may remember it, use a parallel version with the same structure and different numbers, and say so in the report.
- The exit slip adds a second kind of evidence. NCTM's note on action research suggests gathering data in different ways, from different sources and at different times.
- Three weeks is long enough for a routine to become a habit and short enough to finish before the next unit test.
The results table to fill in
| Roll no. | Pre-test (out of 20) | Post-test (out of 20) | Change | Equation marks before | Equation marks after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | |||||
| 2 | |||||
| 3 | |||||
| ... | |||||
| Average |
How to read your results without fear of statistics
You do not need special software to make a sound classroom decision. Work through these questions in order, using the table you filled in.
- What was the average before and after? Add all pre-test scores and divide by the number of students; do the same for the post-test.
- How many students improved, stayed the same, or fell? An average can rise because a few students jumped while most stayed still. Count each group.
- Did the part you targeted improve? In the example, compare the equation marks, not just the total.
- What do the other sources say? Read the exit slips and your diary. If students say step 3 is hardest, that is your next change.
- Was anything else going on? A holiday, a school test, or a new student can affect scores. Note it honestly.
- Is the difference significant? If you want the formal answer, NCERT's module names the paired samples t-test for this design. The module says software such as SPSS can do it; a colleague who has studied research methods can help.
Then decide. NCTM's note ends the cycle with taking action: choose the best option, make short and long-term plans, and keep assessing. In practice there are three outcomes. Keep the change if it helped. Adjust it if it helped some students or some steps. Drop it if nothing moved, and try a different idea in the next cycle. All three are good results, because each one is based on evidence instead of guesswork.
A one-page action research plan template
Copy this table into a notebook or a document and fill in the right-hand column before you start. If you cannot fill a row, your plan is not ready. NCERT's modules treat the title, objective, hypothesis and methodology as the core of the plan, and the extra rows here cover the practical details teachers usually forget.
| Heading | Your answer |
|---|---|
| Problem I see (one sentence) | |
| Evidence that it is a problem (marks, attendance, notes) | |
| Title (change, variable, class, school) | |
| Objective (to compare ... before and after ...) | |
| Hypothesis (null form) | |
| Group (class, section, number of students) | |
| The change I will try, in detail | |
| How long, how often, what time of day | |
| Tool for the pre-test and post-test | |
| Second source of evidence (exit slips, observation, work samples) | |
| Who I will tell (head, colleague, parents) | |
| Dates: pre-test, change starts, post-test, report |
A six-week timeline that fits a normal term
| Week | What you do |
|---|---|
| Week 1 | Notice and narrow the problem; write the title, objective and hypothesis; make the test |
| Week 2 | Give the pre-test; mark it; plan the daily routine; tell the head and parents |
| Weeks 3 to 5 | Run the change every class; collect exit slips; write two lines in your diary after each class |
| Week 6 | Give the post-test; fill the results table; read the slips; decide; write the short report |
Action research topics for Indian classrooms and coaching centres
NCERT's module gives real titles as models: the effect of teaching aids on achievement in mathematics in Class IX, the effect of yoga on stress in Class IX, the effect of classroom assignments on achievement in Hindi in Class VIII, and the effect of English dictation on achievement in English in Class V. Its Module 4 example studies an activity-based method for teaching fractions in Class VII. Below are more ideas in the same shape. Each one names a change you control and a result you can measure.
| Problem you see | Change you could test | What to measure |
|---|---|---|
| Students come late to the first class | A five-minute quiz with a small team point at the very start | Number of late arrivals per week |
| Few students speak in English class | Pair talk for two minutes before anyone answers aloud | Number of students who speak in a class, counted on a checklist |
| Spelling mistakes in written answers | Daily five-word dictation from that week's lesson | Spelling errors in a fixed passage |
| Homework not done | A weekly homework chart shared with parents | Homework completion rate per week |
| Weak recall before tests | Ten-minute self-quizzing at the start of each class | Scores on a short recall test |
| Students copy notes but do not understand | Exit slip with one "explain in your own words" question | Quality of explanations, judged with a simple rubric |
| Online batch students switch off | A poll or quick question every ten minutes | Number of students answering each poll |
If you use a rubric to judge answers, keep it the same before and after. Our guide to rubrics for assessment shows how to build one in a few steps.
How action research counts towards your 50 hours of CPD
This part matters to teachers in India. NCERT's CIET notes that the National Education Policy 2020 expects each teacher to take part in at least 50 hours of continuous professional development (CPD) every year, driven by their own interests.
NCERT's Guidelines for 50 Hours of Continuous Professional Development (2022) list action research both as a suggested CPD theme for teachers and as one of the other CPD activities that earn hours. Under content development and other academic activities, the guidelines give "Action research/innovative projects/case studies: Three days (18 hours)". The same entry appears for teacher educators and institutional leaders. A face-to-face CPD session in these guidelines is 1 hour 30 minutes, and a training day can have four sessions, or 6 hours.
For teachers in CBSE-affiliated schools, CBSE's press release of 17 April 2025 says that, under notifications dated 1 April 2025, all teachers must complete a minimum of 50 hours of training per year: 25 hours through CBSE or government regional training institutes, and 25 hours through in-house or school complex based training.
How a particular school, board or state counts your action research towards CPD can differ. Ask your head of school or the training coordinator which format they need for the report before you start, so your write-up can be counted.
How to write the action research report
NCERT's report-writing module says the report should let any interested teacher repeat the study in their own class without trouble. It suggests writing the main part under headings, not separate chapters, because an action research report is short.
| Part | What goes in it |
|---|---|
| Cover page | Title of the study, name of the researcher, session, name of the school or institution |
| Preliminary part | Acknowledgement, contents, list of tables (pages numbered i, ii, iii) |
| Introduction and conceptual framework | Where and by whom the study was done, and how the problem showed up in teaching |
| Review of related literature and rationale | What others found, and why this study was needed |
| Statement of problem, objective, hypothesis, delimitations | The plan, in the same words you used before starting |
| Methodology | Sample, tool, experimental design, procedure of data collection, data analysis |
| Results and interpretation, discussion, findings | The numbers, what they mean, and what you will do next |
| Supplementary part | References and appendices |
NCERT's module also lists writing rules. The main ones: write the report in the past tense; spell out an abbreviation the first time you use it; use "the teacher" or "the researcher" instead of "I" or "we"; give every table a number and a title; show results to two decimal places; avoid vague words such as less, more or beautiful; and use the same technical word throughout. It also asks for references in APA style.
Common mistakes, and how to avoid them
| Mistake | Why it hurts | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| The problem is too big ("improve results") | You cannot change or measure it in a few weeks | Narrow it to one skill, one class, one term |
| Changing three things at once | You will not know which change worked | Test one change per cycle |
| No pre-test | You cannot show any change | Always measure before you start |
| A different test after | Scores are not comparable | Use the same test, or a parallel version with the same structure |
| Running the change for two days | Too short for any effect to show | Plan for at least two to three weeks |
| Only looking at the average | Hides students who did not improve | Count who improved, stayed or fell |
| Claiming the method works everywhere | Your group does not represent all students | Write "for this class" and invite others to try |
| Naming students in the report | Breaks trust with students and parents | Use roll numbers or codes |
When action research is not the right tool
Action research is for problems you can change inside your own teaching. It is not the right tool for a problem with a cause outside the class, such as a student's health, a family crisis, or bullying; those need the school counsellor, parents or the head. It is not a degree thesis. And it is not worth doing as paperwork only. If you do not plan to change your teaching based on the result, choose a smaller lesson plan improvement instead and save the time.
Frequently asked questions
What is action research in education in simple words?
It is a small study a teacher does in their own class to fix a real teaching problem. You find the problem, try one change, measure students before and after, and use the evidence to decide what to keep. NCERT describes it as a process for problem solving done systematically.
What are the steps of action research?
NCERT's module lists identification of the problem, formulation of hypothesis, method of research, data collection and data analysis, with report writing as the last step. In practice: choose and narrow the problem, write the title and objective, plan the group, tool and design, give a pre-test, run the change, give a post-test, analyse, decide and write it up.
Can a tuition teacher or coaching faculty member do action research?
Yes. Action research is done by the person who faces the problem, in their own class. A tuition batch is a group like any school section. Tell the centre head and parents what you are trying, keep student names out of the report, and use the same pre-test and post-test.
How long should an action research project take?
Long enough for the change to show an effect. NCERT's examples run a change daily for 15 to 30 days, and a first cycle of about six weeks, including planning and the write-up, fits into a normal term.
Do I need statistics for action research?
Not for a first classroom decision. Compare the average before and after, and count how many students improved. NCERT's module names the paired samples t-test as the formal method for the one-group, before-and-after design, if you need to report whether the difference is significant.
Does action research count for the 50 hours of CPD?
NCERT's 2022 Guidelines for 50 Hours of CPD list action research, innovative projects or case studies as an activity worth three days, or 18 hours. Ask your school or board how they want it reported, because the counting process can differ.
What is a good action research title?
NCERT says the title must name the variable, the group and the type of study, for example: a study of the effect of daily English dictation on spelling achievement of Class V students of a named school. If the group is missing, the title is incomplete.
Sources
Rules and rates change: check the source before you rely on a figure.
- Action Research For Teachers, Central Institute of Educational Technology, NCERT
- Module 2: Steps of Action Research, CIET, NCERT
- Module 4: Process of Action Research, CIET, NCERT
- Action Research in Education: An Online Course 2018-19, Report, CIET, NCERT
- Guidelines for 50 Hours of Continuous Professional Development, NCERT (2022)
- Continuous Professional Development opportunities offered by NCERT, CIET brochure
- CBSE press release on mandatory training framework, 17 April 2025
- Action Research: Three Approaches, Emily F. Calhoun, ASCD
- How is Action Research Defined?, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
- Action Research and Minority Problems, Kurt Lewin (1946), Crossref record
More guides for teachers
- AssessmentFormative Assessment: Meaning, Examples and a Step-by-Step Plan for Indian Teachers
- Remedial teachingRemedial Teaching: Meaning, Steps, Strategies and a Ready Remedial Plan for Teachers in India
- RubricsRubrics for Assessment: Types, Examples and How to Make One for Your Class
- Teaching methodsTeaching Methods: 16 Methods of Teaching With Indian Classroom Examples
- Teacher profileTeacher Profile: How to Write One (With Samples), and Put It Online Free
- EarningTeach and Earn on Sikhami: Every Way Teachers Get Paid