• #Adaptive learning
  • #For institutes

Adaptive Learning: Meaning, How It Works, What Indian Research Shows, and How a Coaching Institute Can Start It

Updated on 10 November 2026 · 21 min read · Facts checked against the sources at the end

Adaptive learning means that what a student learns next depends on how that student is doing right now. A short test first finds out what the student already knows. Then each student gets the lesson, the practice and the level of difficulty that fits them, and the plan changes again after every check. A student who is strong moves ahead. A student who is stuck gets an easier step, a hint or a different explanation. Software can do this for each student at once, but a teacher can also do a simple version with a diagnostic test, clear rules and three groups.

This guide is for coaching institutes, tuition centres and teachers in India. It covers how the adaptive loop works, the five types of adaptive learning, what research found (including a large study in Delhi), what NEP 2020 says, a step-by-step plan with a worked Class 8 maths example and templates to copy, how to choose software, India's data law for children, common mistakes, and when adaptive learning is not for you.


What adaptive learning means, in plain words

Think of a good private tutor with one student. The tutor asks a question, watches the answer, and moves on or goes back one step. Adaptive learning tries to bring this habit to many students at the same time.

Every adaptive system, simple or advanced, keeps asking the same three questions about each student:

  1. Where is this student now? A diagnostic test or the last few answers show what the student knows and does not know.
  2. What should this student do next? A rule or a program picks the next lesson, practice set or level of difficulty.
  3. Did it work? The next answers show whether the student has learned it. If yes, move on. If no, try another way.

The U.S. Department of Education, in its 2023 report on artificial intelligence in teaching, notes that the word personalisation is often used for adaptivity but means different things to different people. For some it means giving students voice and choice. For others it means a learning management system (LMS) that recommends a playlist of activities to each student. The same report says that adjusting the difficulty and the order of lesson materials are two of the most common ways that education software adapts. Keep this in mind when a company says its product is adaptive: ask what exactly it changes.

Adaptive learning and the words close to it

TermWhat it meansHow it is different from adaptive learning
Adaptive learningThe next step for each student is chosen from that student's own recent answersThis is the topic of this guide
Personalised learningLearning shaped around each student's needs, interests or paceA wider idea. It can include choice and interests, not just answers
Differentiated instructionA teacher plans different tasks for different groups in one classUsually planned in advance by the teacher, not changed after every answer
Mastery learningA student must show mastery of one unit before moving to the nextAdaptive learning often uses mastery rules inside it
Teaching at the Right LevelChildren are grouped by learning level, not by class or age, and taught from where they areA low-tech way of adapting, done by teachers in groups
Adaptive testingThe next question or section of a test depends on earlier answersAdapts the test, not the teaching
Adaptive learning compared with related ideas

How adaptive learning works: the loop

Adaptive learning runs as a loop. Each turn is small: a few questions, one short lesson, one check.

  1. Diagnose. A short test finds the student's level on each skill, not just one total score.
  2. Choose. A rule picks the next activity. For example: below 50 percent on fractions, go to the fractions repair set.
  3. Teach and practise. The student watches a short lesson or works on a practice set at the right level.
  4. Check. A few new questions test the same skill again.
  5. Adjust. Move ahead, repeat with a different explanation, or call the teacher.

An adaptive course can change five things from one student to another:

What adaptsExample in a coaching classEasy to do by hand?
DifficultyA strong student gets level 3 questions, a weak student gets level 1 firstYes, with three levels of practice sheets
OrderA student who already knows ratios skips to percentagesYes, if your topics are mapped
PaceA fast student finishes the chapter in one week, a slower student in twoPartly. It needs extra time slots
SupportAfter two wrong answers the student sees a hint or a worked exampleYes, if you write hints in advance
FormatA student who did not get the video gets a diagram or a small group talk insteadHard. It needs more material
The five things adaptive learning can change

Types of adaptive learning, from simple to advanced

Adaptive learning is not one product. It is a range, from a teacher's simple rule on paper to an artificial intelligence (AI) tutor that responds to every step a student writes. Most coaching institutes should start at the top of this table and move down only when they have the data and the need.

TypeHow it adaptsWhat you needGood for
Rule-based pathsIf-then rules on test scores send each student to a set of materialA diagnostic test, a rule sheet, material at two or three levelsAny coaching institute or tuition centre, from day one
Section-level adaptive testsThe difficulty of the second part of a test depends on the score in the first partTwo or three versions of the second sectionMock tests and placement tests
Question-level adaptive testsEach next question is chosen from the last answerA large question bank with each question's difficulty knownBig test series with many students
Intelligent tutoring systemsFeedback on each step of a solution, not just the final answerSpecialised software built for a subjectMaths and other subjects with clear steps
AI tutors and assistantsA chatbot explains, asks questions and adjusts to repliesAn AI tool, with a teacher checking its answersExtra practice and doubt-solving, with care
Five types of adaptive learning

A well-known example of a section-level adaptive test is the GRE General Test, used for admission to many graduate schools. Its official page says the Verbal Reasoning and Quantitative Reasoning measures are section-level adaptive: the first section of each is of average difficulty, and the difficulty of the second section depends on how well the test taker did in the first. A coaching institute can copy this idea for its own mock tests without any special software, as the template later in this guide shows.

What research says about adaptive learning

Adaptive learning has been studied for decades, mostly under the name intelligent tutoring systems. The results are encouraging, but they come with conditions that matter for any institute.

StudyWhat it looked atWhat it found
VanLehn, Educational Psychologist, 2011Experiments comparing human tutoring, computer tutoring and no tutoringIntelligent tutoring systems had an effect size of 0.76, close to human tutoring at 0.79
Kulik and Fletcher, Review of Educational Research, 201650 controlled evaluations of intelligent tutoring systemsMedian gain of 0.66 standard deviations, roughly from the 50th to the 75th percentile, but much smaller on standardised tests than on tests made by the developers
Ma and others, Journal of Educational Psychology, 201439 studies of intelligent tutoring for college studentsA moderate positive effect (g of 0.32 to 0.37). Less than human tutoring, more than regular classroom teaching
Kulik and others, Review of Educational Research, 1990108 controlled evaluations of mastery learning programsPositive effects on exam performance in colleges, high schools and upper primary grades
Main research reviews on adaptive and mastery learning

What does an effect size mean? It compares results across studies. In the Kulik and Fletcher review, an effect of 0.66 meant the average student using the system moved from the 50th to about the 75th percentile of the comparison group.

Three warnings from the same studies are worth more than the headline numbers:

  • The test matters. Kulik and Fletcher found gains depended greatly on whether local or standardised tests were used. Gains on your own chapter test may not show up in a board exam.
  • The setup matters. In the same review, evaluations with poor implementations of tutoring systems showed small effects. Buying software is not the same as using it well.
  • Teachers still matter. Ma and others noted some evidence that teachers and teaching methods are important in learning with these systems.

The Indian evidence: a study in Delhi

The strongest evidence on adaptive learning in India comes from a randomised study published in the American Economic Review in 2019 by Karthik Muralidharan, Abhijeet Singh and Alejandro Ganimian. It studied after-school centres in low-income areas of Delhi that used Mindspark, adaptive software made by the Indian firm Educational Initiatives.

How the program worked

  • The centres ran six days a week, 90 minutes a day: 45 minutes on the adaptive software and 45 minutes of group support from an instructor, in groups of 12 to 15 students.
  • The software started with a diagnostic test and then adapted after every activity, so each student worked at their own level, not at the level of their class.
  • It drew on an item bank of more than 45,000 test questions and used patterns in students' mistakes to choose remedial help.
  • 619 students from public middle schools took part. About half won a lottery that gave them free attendance.

What it found

  • After about 4.5 months, lottery winners scored 0.37 standard deviations higher in maths and 0.23 higher in Hindi than students who did not win.
  • Gains in absolute terms were similar for all students, but much larger relative to their usual progress for weaker students.
  • Students in the same class were spread across five to six grade levels. In grade 6, the average student was about 2.5 grade levels behind in maths, and by grade 9 nearly 4.5 levels behind.
  • The authors write that the program raised the productivity of an instructor, not technology by itself, since an instructor was part of every session.

The lesson for a coaching institute: adaptive learning helps most when one batch holds very different levels, and it worked with a teacher in the room, not in place of one.

Teaching at the Right Level: adaptive learning without computers

The Indian NGO Pratham developed Teaching at the Right Level in the early 2000s. According to J-PAL, children are assessed with a simple tool, grouped by learning level rather than age or grade, and taught from what they already know, with ongoing simple checks of progress. J-PAL says the approach has reached over 60 million students in India and Africa. This is adaptive learning done by teachers in groups, and it is the model behind the low-cost plan in this guide.

What NEP 2020 says about adaptive learning

India's National Education Policy 2020 uses the word adaptive in several places:

ParagraphWhat it says, in short
2.4Asks for a robust system of continuous formative and adaptive assessment to track and individualise each student's learning, with a focus on foundational literacy and numeracy
4.35Says AI-based software could be developed to help students track their growth based on learning data
5.15Asks each teacher to do at least 50 hours of professional development a year, covering formative and adaptive assessment among other pedagogies
6.13For children with specific learning disabilities, asks for technology that lets children work at their own pace
23.2Lists adaptive computer testing among the new technologies that will change what and how students learn
Adaptive learning in the National Education Policy 2020

NEP 2020 does not ask anyone to buy a product. Its focus is continuous assessment that changes teaching for each student.

How to start adaptive learning in a coaching institute, step by step

You do not need expensive software to start. You need a clear map of topics, a good diagnostic test, written rules, and material at more than one level. Here is a plan for one chapter. Once it works, repeat it for the next chapter.

Step 1: Break the chapter into small skills

Write down the five to eight skills the chapter needs, including older skills it depends on. Trade-off: too few skills and the test cannot tell you what is wrong; too many and the test becomes too long.

Step 2: Write a short diagnostic test

Write two or three questions for each skill, from easy to medium. Keep the whole test under 20 minutes. Each wrong answer option should match a common mistake, so a wrong choice tells you why the student went wrong. Our guide on how to make a question paper explains blueprints and good options.

Step 3: Set clear rules

Decide the cut-off scores before you see any results, and write them down. A simple rule: on each skill, 2 or 3 right out of 3 means ready; 1 right means needs practice; 0 right means needs re-teaching. Rules written in advance stop you from moving everyone ahead because the syllabus is running late.

Step 4: Prepare material at three levels

For each skill, prepare a repair set (short explanation, worked example, easy questions), a practice set (normal questions) and a challenge set (harder or mixed questions). This is the biggest piece of work. Start with the skills where most students fail, and reuse material across batches every year.

Step 5: Group students by skill, not by rank

Make two or three groups for each skill. A student can be in the challenge group for integers and the repair group for word problems. Change groups after every check, so no one gets stuck with a label.

Step 6: Check again within a week

A short re-test on the same skills, with new questions, tells you who has moved. Students who now pass move up. Students who still fail need a different explanation, not the same one again, and some of your own time in a small group.

Step 7: Look at the numbers once a week

Count how many students are in each group for each skill. If most of the batch fails one skill, the problem is probably the teaching or the question, not the students. Our guide to learning analytics shows how to read this kind of data every week.

Worked example: adaptive learning for one Class 8 maths chapter

This is an example to copy, not a report on a real institute. The chapter is Linear Equations in One Variable, for a Class 8 batch of 30 students who meet five days a week.

Day 1: the diagnostic test

The teacher gives a 12-question test, three questions each on four skills: A, integers and signs; B, simplifying expressions; C, solving equations with the variable on both sides; D, turning word problems into equations. It takes 15 minutes. The teacher marks it skill by skill, not as a total.

Day 1 evening: the rule sheet decides the groups

Skill3 or 2 right (ready)1 right (practice)0 right (re-teach)
A. Integers and signsSkip to skill BPractice set A, 10 questionsRepair set A with number line, then practice set A
B. Simplifying expressionsSkip to skill CPractice set BRepair set B: like terms with tiles or pictures
C. Variable on both sidesChallenge set CPractice set CTeacher group: 20 minutes, worked examples
D. Word problemsChallenge set D: mixed problemsPractice set D with a key-words listTeacher group: drawing the problem first
Example rule sheet for one chapter

Days 2 to 4: three tracks in one room

Each class has three parts. For the first 15 minutes the whole batch learns the day's new idea together. For the next 30 minutes, students work on their own set from the rule sheet. During this time the teacher sits with the re-teach group only, because the other two groups can work from their sets. The last 10 minutes are a three-question exit check on the day's skill.

Day 5: the re-check

A new 12-question test, on the same four skills, with different numbers. Students who reached ready move up. Students still at zero on a skill get a different explanation the next week, and the teacher calls their parents if the same skill fails twice in a row.

What the teacher learns

Suppose 20 of the 30 students score zero on skill D, word problems. That is not 20 weak students. It means the batch was never really taught to turn words into an equation, so the teacher re-teaches it to everyone before going back to groups. Decisions come from evidence, one skill at a time.

Keep each set short. A practice set of 8 to 10 questions that a student finishes is better than a set of 40 that they abandon. The maths quizzes on Sikhami can add extra practice outside class.

Template: an adaptive mock test in two stages

Copy the GRE idea for your monthly mock tests. Strong students get a real challenge and weak students a test they can learn from.

PartWhat to put in itRule
Stage 1 (everyone)15 questions of medium difficulty across the syllabusScore it before Stage 2
Stage 2, level A15 harder questionsFor students with 11 or more right in Stage 1
Stage 2, level B15 medium questionsFor students with 6 to 10 right
Stage 2, level C15 easier questions on the most basic skillsFor students with 5 or fewer right
ScoringGive more marks per question in level A than in level CWrite the marks on the paper so students know the rule
Follow-upEach student gets the repair sets for the skills they missedRe-test within two weeks
Two-stage adaptive mock test template

Online, run Stage 1 as one test and send each student the right Stage 2 link. On paper, print three versions of Stage 2 and hand them out after a short marking break. See also our guide to online exam software.

Adaptive learning on an LMS, and on Sikhami

Any learning management system can support a rule-based adaptive course if it has a few features. When you choose an LMS for this, check for these:

  • Question-wise and student-wise test results, not just a total score.
  • Tests with a pass mark, retakes and explanations shown after each answer.
  • Sections, so repair, practice and challenge material sit in separate places.
  • Analytics that show who is falling behind and where students stop watching.

Sikhami is a social network for people learning in India. Coaching institutes and tuition centres get a free LMS on it: video courses with tests and certificates, classroom batches, attendance, fees and receipts. Tests are multiple choice, with an explanation for each answer, a pass mark and an optional time limit, and students can take them again. Lectures can open a set number of days after a student enrols, and course analytics show test results and where learners stop watching. Sikhami does not choose a different path for each student by itself: you write the rules, read the results, and point each student to the right section. Learn more on the free LMS page.

How to choose adaptive learning software

If you are thinking of buying an adaptive learning platform, ask these questions first. Get the answers in writing.

Question to askWhy it matters
What exactly adapts: difficulty, order, pace, hints or format?Many products only change difficulty and order
Is the content mapped to our syllabus, board and exam?Adaptive paths are only as good as the questions behind them
What evidence do you have that students learn more?Ask for a study, and check whether it used independent tests
What does the teacher see, and can the teacher override the path?Teachers need to stay in charge of decisions
What data does it collect about children, and where is it kept?Children's data has special rules in India
What does it cost per student per year, and what happens to our data if we stop?Hidden costs and lock-in are common
Questions to ask before you buy adaptive learning software

Student data and the law

Adaptive learning runs on student data. Under India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, a child is anyone under eighteen. Section 9 says a business must get verifiable parental consent before processing a child's personal data, and must not do tracking or behavioural monitoring of children or target advertising at them, with exceptions the government can set. A notification of 13 November 2025 brings Section 9 into force eighteen months from that date. Read the official text or ask a lawyer before you choose a tool, and collect only data you will use for teaching.

Common mistakes, and how to avoid them

MistakeWhat goes wrongHow to avoid it
Using only a total scoreYou know who is weak but not what to fixMark every test skill by skill
Making groups permanentStudents feel labelled and stop tryingChange groups after every check, and say so out loud
Giving the same explanation againA student who did not get it once rarely gets it the second time the same wayUse a new example, picture or small-group talk
Letting software replace the teacherStudents click through without learningKeep a teacher in the room and in charge, as in the Delhi study
Trusting gains on your own tests onlyResults may not hold in board or entrance examsCheck progress on an independent test too
Common mistakes in adaptive learning

Also watch that weak students do not only ever get easy work. Make sure every student also sees grade-level work and has a clear way to climb back up.

When adaptive learning is not for you

Adaptive learning is not always worth the effort. Be honest about these cases:

  • Your batch is already at a similar level, for example a crash course for students who have all finished the syllabus. A good common plan may serve them well.
  • The subject is mostly open-ended, like essay writing or debate. The U.S. Department of Education report notes that AI models have mostly been better at closed tasks, such as solving a maths problem, than at open, creative ones.
  • You do not have time to make material at more than one level. Start with one chapter, or with the two-stage test, rather than promising adaptive learning across a whole course.
  • You are buying software to look modern. If teachers will not act on the reports, spend the money on practice tests and doubt sessions instead.

For most institutes the honest middle path is: test often, mark by skill, group by need, regroup every week, and keep the teacher in charge. That is adaptive learning, with or without software. See also remedial teaching, and browse maths topics for practice material.

Frequently asked questions

What is adaptive learning in simple words?

Adaptive learning means each student's next lesson, practice or level of difficulty depends on how that student answered the last few questions. A strong student moves ahead, and a student who is stuck gets an easier step, a hint or a new explanation.

What is an example of adaptive learning?

A Class 8 maths teacher gives a short diagnostic test, then sends each student to a repair, practice or challenge set for each skill, and re-tests within a week. In software, an example is a program that picks the next question based on the last answer. The GRE General Test is a well-known adaptive test: the second section of each measure depends on the score in the first.

Is adaptive learning the same as personalised learning?

Not exactly. Personalised learning is the wider idea, which can include interests and choices. Adaptive learning changes the next step from the student's own answers.

Does adaptive learning need artificial intelligence?

No. Many adaptive courses run on simple if-then rules based on test scores. AI can make adaptivity finer, such as feedback on each step of a solution, but a teacher with a diagnostic test and a rule sheet can do a useful version.

Does adaptive learning really improve results?

Research is positive but conditional. Reviews of intelligent tutoring systems found gains close to human tutoring in one review and moderate gains in another, and a study in Delhi found large gains in maths over about 4.5 months. Gains were smaller where the software was used poorly or measured on standardised tests.

What does NEP 2020 say about adaptive learning?

NEP 2020 asks for continuous formative and adaptive assessment to track and individualise each student's learning (paragraph 2.4), lists adaptive computer testing among new technologies (23.2), and includes adaptive assessment in teachers' professional development (5.15).

Can a small tuition centre use adaptive learning?

Yes. Start with one chapter: break it into skills, give a short diagnostic test, set rules, prepare material at two or three levels, and re-check within a week.

Sources

Rules and rates change: check the source before you rely on a figure.

  1. Disrupting Education? Experimental Evidence on Technology-Aided Instruction in India (American Economic Review, 2019)
  2. NBER Working Paper 22923: Disrupting Education? (full text, revised July 2017)
  3. National Education Policy 2020 (Ministry of Education)
  4. Teaching at the Right Level to improve learning (J-PAL)
  5. Kulik and Fletcher (2016), Effectiveness of Intelligent Tutoring Systems: A Meta-Analytic Review (ERIC)
  6. VanLehn (2011), The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems (ERIC)
  7. Ma and others (2014), A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Intelligent Tutoring Systems on College Students' Academic Learning (ERIC)
  8. Kulik and others (1990), Effectiveness of Mastery Learning Programs: A Meta-Analysis (ERIC)
  9. GRE General Test structure (ETS)
  10. Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and Learning (U.S. Department of Education, 2023)
  11. The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (Gazette of India, via MeitY)
  12. Notification G.S.R. 843(E) on commencement of the DPDP Act (MeitY, 13 November 2025)

More guides for institutes